@asymco would you mind sharing the original data set for that graph? DM me if you want to email...
-
-
-
Replying to @asymco
@asymco I compared the ARPU data to iOS and Android browser share:http://stratechery.com/2013/the-visual-case-for-a-low-cost-iphone/ …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @asymco
@asymco thank you so much. Fixed it: http://stratechery.com/2013/the-visual-case-for-a-low-cost-iphone/ … It's approximately 98798% better.1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent the question you don’t address is how much profit is in the area not addressed by iPhone & at what point it’s too costly 2 bother2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eric_perlberg
@relentlessFocus LOVE your photography style - I have similar taste (but not as good).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent you make good points. I’d put more emphasis on sticky services & theories of personal luxury items1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eric_perlberg
@relentlessFocus yeah, that's kind of where my head's at too. I think the stickiness point is particularly undervalued. Folks don't switch.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent on items owned that people are psychologically close to; phones, cars, jewellery, etc. other factors beside price play impt role.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@relentlessFocus interesting list of items - all are ostentatious, as well
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.