I have no desire to see Maryland or Rutgers in the BigTen.If we're going to expand to the ACC, give me Duke, UNC, or UVA.
-
-
Replying to @nirajvpatel
@nirajvpatel right, because they're available... This is a pure BTN money brag. DC and NYC instantly become 1st and 3rd largest tv markets1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent obviously. But I don't buy rutgers moving the needle in NYC. The rutgers addition really bothers me1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nirajvpatel
@nirajvpatel I think@ShaileshIngale is on to something. It's the alumni angle. True, it's NJ, but plenty close for 1 game a year x 41 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent@shaileshingale rutgers? C'mon, big ten alums are everywhere. MSU and purdue can't even fill their home stadiums.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nirajvpatel
@nirajvpatel@shaileshingale I mean big ten alums from other schools will go to games at Rutgers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent@shaileshingale no they won't. Again, outside of the name B1G schools, purdue fans aren't going to travel in mass to rutgers2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@nirajvpatel @shaileshingale WI, PSU, NEB, OSU, MICH, IA all will travel. It's not that far from the city
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.