Democrats' radically nuclear response to the SCOTUS vacancy is a real threat to Joe Biden's candidacy. Up until now, Biden has been able to run as the "take a breath" candidate. Things have been crazy; here's an empathetic elderly gentleman who will restore normalcy.
-
-
Checks and balances were designed to require overwhelming consent to major political changes. Democrats have long objected to those checks and balances, but have refrained from utterly abolishing them. That's because the consequences of abolishing them is national dissolution.
Show this thread -
That's why Biden is hesitating here. He's afraid of ruling out going nuclear -- which would likely win him the election -- because he's afraid of sapping the base of its energy.
Show this thread -
He's also afraid of endorsing going nuclear, because he's afraid the election will then become a referendum on his endorsement of radicalism.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why should PR not be a state?
-
Have you taken a peek at their financials?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It would make civil war absolutely unavoidable
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If that happened I would want to move to a state that would secede.
-
There's no such thing as secession in the constitution. Its called armed rebellion. Good luck with that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.