They obviously wanted him to die soon - hence the reason for not treating him properly or moving him to Italy. If they firmly believe he will die they shouldn't have the right to say if he can go home or not tbf. The parents are that boys carers and have been for 2 days.
While you're at it, tell us whether someone with "virtually nothing left of his brain" would be suffering. Extra points if you can sing and tap dance while doing this.pic.twitter.com/xcq1P161bq
-
-
That should be obvious. It depends on what is left of the brain which is not clear from these statements. I never said he would *definitely* be suffering merely that it is a possibility and unless you know exactly which brain regions are intact, you cannot contradict that.
-
What do you think "there is virtually nothing of his brain left", actually means?
-
I have already explained how, by definition, he is not brain dead as he is breathing and that there is, therefore, the possibility he can experience pain. To continue to deny that possibility makes you either proud or stupid.
-
I understand your definition of 'brain dead'. Understood. My question is what do you think "there is virtually nothing of his brain left", actually means?
-
Not “my” definition of brain dead. The medical definition of brain dead. Don’t use words you don’t understand

-
You're unable to answer the question. What do you think "there is virtually nothing of his brain left", actually means?
-
Because it’s not a medically descriptive term, there is not certain definition and interpretation is subjective. Clearly he has severe brain damage but it has not affected all regions of the brain or there would be no “virtually” about it. This isn’t helping your case.
-
I can, however, easily tell you what it doesn’t mean. Brain dead!

- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
