No, love child of Ted Cruz and Ross Mathews. I was responding to Yuri, who asked what moral solutions existed OUTSIDE of blockchain. If you wanted to answer outside of my response, you shouldn't have responded to me.
-
-
Are you really this dense? You responded to Yuri's train of thought. He asked a question. I answered. You did too: you tried to take issue with my answer by using the word "actually", and then you threw your Lizard against the wall. Don't worry. It only made a tiny splat.
-
I used the word 'actually'. How awful for you. Did you take offence?
-
*sigh* The reason you using 'actually' has bearing here is because it indicates you were responding to MY tweet, NOT trying to address the overall premise of this thread as you tried to subsequently claim. And I'm still waiting in how you think Komodo challenges IOTA.
-
You infer it. You don't know my reasons. All this projecting and mewing is, is a mirror into your thought processes. And they are found wanting.
-
The point of writing words, brain pan, is so the reader doesn't HAVE to infer; words have MEANING. Any twit can see that you were responding to me and attempting to claim something about your lizard platform that you clearly cannot back when pressed. -
Stop eating soy Mikey.
-
And how quickly you've exhausted your ability to defend yourself. Stop being dishonest. You'll be much less of a dick.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.