Nearly every argument I've read against free migration presupposes that citizenship is a meaningful distinction among people. It's not.
-
-
Bad ideology of immigrants, which sometimes escapes the error of citizenism, but more often than not doesn't. (Depends on the person.)
-
For example, I did speak to one person who said he'd exile citizens for being communists. That's consistent... in a terrible way.
-
are there any sins that would warrant exile in your view?
-
Not from a country. From a voluntaryist community with its own rules, possibly, yes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Citizenism - foreigners must serve the state's goals or else go Authoritarianism - dissidents must go Fascism - other ethnic groups must go
-
In practice, most authoritarians and fascists adopt citizen-based presumptions. But the "helicopter" crowd theoretically will kill citizens.
-
Where they tend to be inconsistent are the measures they'll use against citizens to reduce theft via taxation now.
-
Ex: banning/controlling substances that may necessitate more tax expenditure via Health Care State.
-
printing mickey mouse money (fiat currency) and in the employment of the banks with their criminal fractional reserve banking
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.