YouTube banned a vegan dude who rescued pigeons and produced carefully worded content specifically designed not to violate their TOS. No reason given.
Ludicrous and proof of flagrant partisan censorship of conservatives.
RT if you think @TeamYouTube should restore his account.
What if there were a conservative platform that censored pro-LGBT, pro-Jihad, and pro-abortion content? A lot of people might actually like a platform like that. There should be a right for those spaces to exist, just like the leftists... Wait I don't believe that at all...
-
-
LGBT content is harmful to the public square, abortion is murder, and Jihadis should not be allowed to spread genecide war rhetoric on any platform. These should indecencies be censored.
-
Publicly available Social Platforms should be regulated by the FCC and required to protect non-profain (PG), first amendment rights. It is not reasonable to expect conservatives to resort to obscure platforms to find audience while first-class citizens are free to use any.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.