well, we all know these gimmicks are not about protecting users, or a realistic mitigation would have been provided.
FWIW, Project Zero has nothing to do with the win32k stuff you're referring to...
-
-
.. but I'd be interested to hear your views on the 'additional danger' - I see it as a balancing act, overall.
-
you provided no mitigation and gave vuln details => malware can start using it and no way for users to protect
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
could be. But that policy is also used by P0. It's the policy and its application by GOOG that's wrong
-
You said that deadlines are OK, but that our application is wrong. Details? What should we do exactly?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.