Lots of people using "sparse" vs "dense" to reason about vulnerability research recently, but I'm not convinced that it's a useful exercise
-
-
I think it's almost always more useful to look at the ratio of bug fixes versus introduction: i.e. are we trending towards "less dense"?
-
The latter is less subjective because at the very least you can measure "cost per bug per researcher" for a given attack surface over time.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@LilyAblon@benhawkes Agree -Would need to define it in context; Yes, sparse, as in finite. Also dense, as in more than 0%. Neither useful. -
@LilyAblon@benhawkes I would suggest the (loosely asymptotic) difficulty to find and exploit vs patch bugs as a more useful analogy. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.