Which of these would you most want in paperback?
-
-
The "Meaningness overview" would cover the conceptual framework and explain briefly the most common stances:
* eternalism, nihilism, existentialism, and the complete stance
* no-self, true self, and nebulously patterned self
* mission, materialism, & enjoyable usefulness2 replies 2 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Meaningness
Is this something you’ve been working on, or just contemplating? I’ve considered making a fan edit in this spirit before
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benedictfritz
Contemplating. The whole thing will clearly never be finished, so the question is how to get the most usefulness in the time available.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
I think with the new complete stance sections there is a version that exists that is complete. I do think all of the unfinished section stubs and pointing to how much more there is does the existing material a bit of a disservice
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That stuff makes it harder to navigate, can make readers feel a sense of “I won’t read it now, I’ll wait til it’s done”, etc. I think re-approaching the project in its current state and orienting around the most important elements of what’s there would make it way more accessible
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.