D'oh. RT@bencasselman: "Cash for clunkers" actually *reduced* spending on cars, per new @nberpubs research: http://53eig.ht/UXeNN4
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Ladies & gentlemen, the 111th US Congress: MT
@bencasselman: "Cash for clunkers" actually *reduced* spending on carshttp://53eig.ht/UXeNN4Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@bencasselman@FiveThirtyEight@nberpubs But reduced auto emissions by getting less efficient/higher polluting autos off the highways.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@bencasselman it was the environmental rule, not the subsidy, that reduced the spending@FiveThirtyEight@nberpubs -
@MigeruBlogger@FiveThirtyEight@nberpubs Right. It was the way the program was designed that had the effect. - Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@bencasselman@FiveThirtyEight@nberpubs Is Texas representative of the rest of the country? -
@TomBruneDC I wondered the same thing. Seems like Texans would be more likely to buy trucks/SUVs, which would make negative impact larger. - Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@bencasselman@nberpubs Wht would the long term effects be on reduced gasoline usage to econ? how many millions Gal does that save per year?Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@bencasselman@FiveThirtyEight@nberpubs Texas, the state that couldn't give a rip about fuel efficient cars. Total political piece.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.