These manifesto style is identical to Anders Brevik’s. Now used by most White Supremicist killers. Always start with a self identification mstatement, why he did it. A long screed about White Genocide & Immigrant hate. Then a Q&A & ends with a “Bye! White men Take a stand” rant
-
-
-
It's kind of like the equivalent to those "martyr videos" used by jihadists. These worthless chuds want respect they think they're entitled to, but which they cannot earn because of their failings.
-
Exactly. Perfect analysis.
- 另外 1 条回复
新对话 -
-
-
Can you guys confirm its legitimacy?
-
We're working in it, but it's linked from a 8chan account, and appears to be prior to the shooting.
- 另外 1 条回复
新对话 -
-
-
What shitposting? Shouldn't be taken literally? This is a dangerously irresponsible statement. Wow.
-
Yeah, ok. Just kids messing around. Trying to one up each other and shit. None of these kids believe anything they've said. Shitposting with bullshit.
对话结束
新对话 -
-
-
Mr Marmel asks the question which should be on everyone's lipshttps://twitter.com/Marmel/status/1122257907007967232 …
- 另外 1 条回复
新对话 -
-
-
Here is a "John Ernest" 15 minutes from the site of the shooting. Unconfirmed but same name and relevant location information:pic.twitter.com/gjjDpy4DHj
谢谢。Twitter 会使用此信息,来优化你的时间线。 撤销撤销
-
-
-
8chan again.
谢谢。Twitter 会使用此信息,来优化你的时间线。 撤销撤销
-
-
-
Anyone familiar with the lingo used in the chans recognize his verbiage to be slightly off. Someone is trying too hard to appear to be an anon (again). A true anon would not advertise blatantly. Timing of would-be whistleblower (now posting in the chans) is also suspect.
-
Whistleblower? I agree this is an obvious set up against anons....reminiscent of NZ
-
It's becoming increasingly obvious to me that it's yet another
op. They're getting sloppy. -
Sloppy, yes. Theyve never bern very emart, lol
- 另外 1 条回复
新对话 -
-
-
A mass shooter’s manifesto should never be taken seriously.
-
Unless we want an insight into pure lunacy.. Even then we should bring a big grain of salt
-
Interestingly, the Unabombers manifesto was on point and predicted a lot of the issues we face due to technological advancement. He chose the wrong way to go about changing things, though.
-
I can't say I've read it in depth, but now I'm kind of curious
-
He was actually quite brilliant - his turn to evil acts was a tragedy. He believed that technology was developing too fast, and that human beings removed from nature was going to be a disaster. Looking at social media, surveillance, the ruination of the environment...he was right
- 另外 1 条回复
新对话 -
加载似乎需要一段时间。
Twitter 可能超载或出现了暂时故障。重试或访问 Twitter 状态以了解更多信息。