These manifesto style is identical to Anders Brevik’s. Now used by most White Supremicist killers. Always start with a self identification mstatement, why he did it. A long screed about White Genocide & Immigrant hate. Then a Q&A & ends with a “Bye! White men Take a stand” rant
-
-
-
It's kind of like the equivalent to those "martyr videos" used by jihadists. These worthless chuds want respect they think they're entitled to, but which they cannot earn because of their failings.
-
Exactly. Perfect analysis.
- 1 annet svar
Ny samtale -
-
-
Can you guys confirm its legitimacy?
-
We're working in it, but it's linked from a 8chan account, and appears to be prior to the shooting.
- 1 annet svar
Ny samtale -
-
-
What shitposting? Shouldn't be taken literally? This is a dangerously irresponsible statement. Wow.
-
Yeah, ok. Just kids messing around. Trying to one up each other and shit. None of these kids believe anything they've said. Shitposting with bullshit.
Slutten på samtalen
Ny samtale -
-
-
Mr Marmel asks the question which should be on everyone's lipshttps://twitter.com/Marmel/status/1122257907007967232 …
- 1 annet svar
Ny samtale -
-
-
Here is a "John Ernest" 15 minutes from the site of the shooting. Unconfirmed but same name and relevant location information:pic.twitter.com/gjjDpy4DHj
Takk. Twitter bruker denne informasjonen til å forbedre tidslinjen din. AngreAngre
-
-
-
8chan again.
Takk. Twitter bruker denne informasjonen til å forbedre tidslinjen din. AngreAngre
-
-
-
Anyone familiar with the lingo used in the chans recognize his verbiage to be slightly off. Someone is trying too hard to appear to be an anon (again). A true anon would not advertise blatantly. Timing of would-be whistleblower (now posting in the chans) is also suspect.
-
Whistleblower? I agree this is an obvious set up against anons....reminiscent of NZ
-
It's becoming increasingly obvious to me that it's yet another
op. They're getting sloppy. -
Sloppy, yes. Theyve never bern very emart, lol
- 1 annet svar
Ny samtale -
-
-
A mass shooter’s manifesto should never be taken seriously.
-
Unless we want an insight into pure lunacy.. Even then we should bring a big grain of salt
-
Interestingly, the Unabombers manifesto was on point and predicted a lot of the issues we face due to technological advancement. He chose the wrong way to go about changing things, though.
-
I can't say I've read it in depth, but now I'm kind of curious
-
He was actually quite brilliant - his turn to evil acts was a tragedy. He believed that technology was developing too fast, and that human beings removed from nature was going to be a disaster. Looking at social media, surveillance, the ruination of the environment...he was right
- 1 annet svar
Ny samtale -
Lastingen ser ut til å ta sin tid.
Twitter kan være overbelastet, eller det kan ha oppstått et midlertidig problem. Prøv igjen, eller se Twitters status for mer informasjon.