These manifesto style is identical to Anders Brevik’s. Now used by most White Supremicist killers. Always start with a self identification mstatement, why he did it. A long screed about White Genocide & Immigrant hate. Then a Q&A & ends with a “Bye! White men Take a stand” rant
-
-
-
It's kind of like the equivalent to those "martyr videos" used by jihadists. These worthless chuds want respect they think they're entitled to, but which they cannot earn because of their failings.
-
Exactly. Perfect analysis.
- 답글 1개 더 보기
새로운 대화 -
-
-
Can you guys confirm its legitimacy?
-
We're working in it, but it's linked from a 8chan account, and appears to be prior to the shooting.
- 답글 1개 더 보기
새로운 대화 -
-
-
What shitposting? Shouldn't be taken literally? This is a dangerously irresponsible statement. Wow.
-
Yeah, ok. Just kids messing around. Trying to one up each other and shit. None of these kids believe anything they've said. Shitposting with bullshit.
대화 종료
새로운 대화 -
-
-
Mr Marmel asks the question which should be on everyone's lipshttps://twitter.com/Marmel/status/1122257907007967232 …
- 답글 1개 더 보기
새로운 대화 -
-
-
Here is a "John Ernest" 15 minutes from the site of the shooting. Unconfirmed but same name and relevant location information:pic.twitter.com/gjjDpy4DHj
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소
-
-
-
8chan again.
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소
-
-
-
Anyone familiar with the lingo used in the chans recognize his verbiage to be slightly off. Someone is trying too hard to appear to be an anon (again). A true anon would not advertise blatantly. Timing of would-be whistleblower (now posting in the chans) is also suspect.
-
Whistleblower? I agree this is an obvious set up against anons....reminiscent of NZ
-
It's becoming increasingly obvious to me that it's yet another
op. They're getting sloppy. -
Sloppy, yes. Theyve never bern very emart, lol
- 답글 1개 더 보기
새로운 대화 -
-
-
A mass shooter’s manifesto should never be taken seriously.
-
Unless we want an insight into pure lunacy.. Even then we should bring a big grain of salt
-
Interestingly, the Unabombers manifesto was on point and predicted a lot of the issues we face due to technological advancement. He chose the wrong way to go about changing things, though.
-
I can't say I've read it in depth, but now I'm kind of curious
-
He was actually quite brilliant - his turn to evil acts was a tragedy. He believed that technology was developing too fast, and that human beings removed from nature was going to be a disaster. Looking at social media, surveillance, the ruination of the environment...he was right
- 답글 1개 더 보기
새로운 대화 -
로딩하는데 시간이 지연되고 있습니다.
트위터의 트래픽이 폭주했거나 일시적인 문제가 발생했을 수 있습니다. 다시 시도하거나 트위터 상태 페이지를 방문하여 자세한 내용을 확인해 보세요.