"agro-ecological approaches do not substantially improve productivity and do not therefore help address the food insecurity of smallholder farmers.”
@mark_lynas @ScienceAlly on new meta-analysis published in Nature Foodhttps://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2020/07/scientific-meta-analysis-agro-ecology-risks-harming-the-poor-and-worsening-gender-inequality-in-africa/ …
I find it hard to believe that the Breakthrough Institute is promoting this article, which erroneously conflates conservation ag with agroecology and then makes wild conclusions "agroecology trapping farmers in poverty". Is this the kind of scholarship that the BTI supports?
-
-
Not surprising. Ecomodernists like Lynas, and ecomodernist groups for the most part, uncritically embrace & promote
#GMOs.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.