Laura KuenssbergVerified account

Name the sources, it is the only way to combat the spread of propaganda. If you *want* to combat the spread of propaganda, that is.

Yes the sources should be named and shamed.

Even if it had happened it would have required further journalism to confirm that it was a Labour activist. And further journalism to confirm they were ferried there by Labour HQ. The failure wasn’t one inaccuracy, it was systemic. The rapid reaffirmation of hearsay - unchecked.

Just days ago she refused to comment on trade documents and Irish border documents cos she hadn't had chance to validate them #sacklaurakuenssberg

You've probably got to name the sources then. Someone has tried to use a BBC journalist to mislead the public. That's a threat to the perceived integrity of you and the BBC as a whole.

Did you know you can complain about the (not very) impartial BBC reporter Laura Kuenssberg? https://bbc.co.uk/contact/complaints … I just did.

It wasn't "confusion" it wasn't just "wrong" it was a LIE. 3 letters. It's not that hard to type. L.I.E. There is an election in progress and so it's in the public interest to know who those sources were who passed on that LIE.

@bbclaurak Your biases are showing. I’ve not joined the pile-ons but this crosses all sorts of red lines. It’s shoddy journalism & clearly inspired by political allegiance. Whatever happens on Thursday, you have forfeited all credibility with tens of millions of viewers. Disgrace

Name them. They are clearly liars. They don’t deserve to be protected.

Shouldn't name the sources. Just don't use them again. Fair play for apologising.