That is, with respect, incredibly arrogant. The vast majority of people knew what they were voting for.
-
-
Replying to @bazzacollins @DarienGS
is that true, do you think? That maj understood what they were voting for?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @shonaghosh @DarienGS
I'd rather deal with consequences of Brexit, than 52% of country (rightly) believing their opinion was ignored.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Referendum results often don't translate directly into action. It's one factor and a changing situation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
By that rationale, it would have been legit for Gov to have taken us out with 48% of vote.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It would be. Parliament has the power and referendum is not binding. Not good politics though.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's even worse politics to ignore will of people. Highest turnout in modern history.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Choice is facts vs delusion once again. We know this wasn't a meaningful decision. So pretend it was?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Again, how do you "know it wasn't a meaningful decision"? Impossible to gauge people's true sentiment
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
or complaining en masse, incorrectly, about immigration
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You don't get to judge if people's reason for voting was rational.
-
-
I do. But I wouldn't conflate judgement with a right to overrule the democratic process
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.