@PaulOckenden True, but then why not include data as a coverage condition, like they do with the 3G/4G licences?
@PaulOckenden I presume if there was huge profit to be made, they'd have upgraded years ago. They'll find cheapest way to meet target.
-
-
@bazzacollins So you assume it's cheaper to fill a gap with 2G than 3/4G? Why? -
@PaulOckenden I assume there may be solutions, like repeaters/mast sharing, that are cheaper than new 3G/4G masts. -
@bazzacollins But why would they repeat 2G over 3/4G? I just can't see your argument here at all. It doesn't make sense beyond the headline! -
@PaulOckenden Because if a village in Cornwall only has 2G masts, it's easier/cheaper to repeart those than replace.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.