@bazzacollins @MsEmmaChaplin @Sweder The principal of privacy is worth defending but not to an nth point with no recourse.
-
-
Replying to @Bohemiangirl
@Bohemiangirl@MsEmmaChaplin@Sweder But what's the nth point? What he allegedly said was crass and offensive, but not illegal?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@Bohemiangirl@Sweder Can I just clear one thing up - did PA snoop or was she copied in?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MsEmmaChaplin
@MsEmmaChaplin@bazzacollins@Bohemiangirl I’m not certain. She says not, he/ PL say she did.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sweder
@Sweder@bazzacollins That matters to me, because if he copied her in, it's hardly snooping is it? It makes him an arrogant stupid twat.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MsEmmaChaplin
@MsEmmaChaplin@Sweder I doubt he actively copied her in. Normally PAs have blanket access to inbox.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@MsEmmaChaplin agreed, but if she had ‘regular access’ to the inbox I can’t see how anything in it can be deemed ‘private2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sweder
@Sweder@bazzacollins@MsEmmaChaplin football as much as I wouldn't want a secret pedophile looking after my kids1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cobbycobbcobb
@cobbycobbcobb@Sweder@MsEmmaChaplin There's a hell of a difference between those two examples, Mr C. Not arguing privacy trumps illegality1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@Sweder@MsEmmaChaplin I also think that if his emails contained racist content he'd have gone long ago. Double standards1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@cobbycobbcobb @Sweder @MsEmmaChaplin That is undeniably true and not something for which I have a counter-argument.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.