Why I don't think it was right to sack Richard Scudamore: http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2014/05/21/your-right-to-a-private-life-extends-to-your-email/ …
-
-
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins I thought they'd been no sanctions, have I got that wrong? I don't agree with you, you're probably not surprised to hear.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MsEmmaChaplin
@MsEmmaChaplin As I said to@sweder, I think the principle of privacy is worth defending, no matter how unsavoury the individuals involved.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@MsEmmaChaplin@Sweder The principal of privacy is worth defending but not to an nth point with no recourse.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bohemiangirl
@Bohemiangirl@MsEmmaChaplin@Sweder But what's the nth point? What he allegedly said was crass and offensive, but not illegal?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@Bohemiangirl@Sweder Can I just clear one thing up - did PA snoop or was she copied in?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MsEmmaChaplin
@MsEmmaChaplin@bazzacollins@Bohemiangirl I’m not certain. She says not, he/ PL say she did.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sweder
@Sweder@bazzacollins That matters to me, because if he copied her in, it's hardly snooping is it? It makes him an arrogant stupid twat.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MsEmmaChaplin
@MsEmmaChaplin@Sweder I doubt he actively copied her in. Normally PAs have blanket access to inbox.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@MsEmmaChaplin unless the e-mail was headed ‘P&C’ it must be assumed that the PA would read it. The man’s a fool1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Sweder @MsEmmaChaplin Hard to know what the IT set-up was. He was certainly foolish, I'll give you that :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.