@bazzacollins I thought that. Presume remarks have been on there a while, anniversary drew attention, followed by some digging?
I know the Liverpool Echo broke the story, but surely its reporter wasn't monitoring the article, looking for abusive edits?
-
-
-
@Sweder Perhaps. Although inflammatory edits on Wikipedia are usually removed pronto. They would have done well to spot it casually. -
@bazzacollins gotcha. More to it, then. At risk of offending, Scousers not exactly strangers to conspiracy theories - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.