Don't understand how Oxlade-Chamberlain got off. Surely his intent was to stop a goal. Whether it was goal-bound or not is immaterial.
-
-
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins He didn't deny a goal or goal scoring opportunity though.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leemtrobbo
@leemtrobbo It was a clear opportunity to score a goal. Why else would he have handled it? He should escape punishment for poor judgement?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins the opportunity to score a goal had gone, the shot was going wide. All he did was deny a goal kick. Laws are in his favour.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leemtrobbo
@leemtrobbo By that logic, players who swing a punch and miss shouldn't be sent off for violent conduct?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins not necessarily. The player's 'conduct' would still be considered 'violent' whether he connects or not.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@leemtrobbo Hmmm… We may have to disagree on this one. Besides, you’re just jealous an outfield player pulled off a good save :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.