@adambanksdotcom Outcome could have been improved if he didn't carry a gun. Jury clearly not buying the eyewitness account.
-
-
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins You’re saying is once police knew he had a gun they went expecting to have to kill him whatever happened. That’s execution.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom He was armed. There was no failure of intelligence. He posed a threat to their lives during that pursuit.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@adambanksdotcom If somebody surrendered, should you assume they might still be armed and shoot them anyway?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulLomax
@PaulLomax@bazzacollins@adambanksdotcom Worth reading the details of the finding (it's an easy read).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ianbetteridge
@ianbetteridge@bazzacollins@adambanksdotcom Word of the police (who all wrote their statements in the same room without IPCC) vs witness?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulLomax
@PaulLomax@ianbetteridge@adambanksdotcom which one of us are you suggesting has missed something, Ian?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@PaulLomax@adambanksdotcom I'm suggesting that having an opinion about the case might be improved by reading the source.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ianbetteridge
@ianbetteridge@PaulLomax@adambanksdotcom I have.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@paullomax@adambanksdotcom A jury, who spent days listening to all the evidence? Or you lot, who didn't?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ianbetteridge @PaulLomax @adambanksdotcom That was precisely the point I retweeted earlier. I'm not quibbling with their verdict.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.