Would like to know on what grounds the woman was remanded but the man was bailed in the Twitter abuse case. Anyone? http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/386401/abusive-tweeter-remanded-in-custody …
-
-
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins I was wondering that. I can only assume that the content of the offending tweet was rather more direct than the other one.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iainmacintosh
@iainmacintosh Perhaps. But then why wasn't she held in the first place? She's been on bail for six months.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins Good point. Hard to see, from the info available, what point her detention would serve.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iainmacintosh
@iainmacintosh It all become clear http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/10556507/Twitter-trolls-admit-abusing-feminist-campaigner-online.html …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins I love the quote from the defence! That's your defence?!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@iainmacintosh The phrase "banged to rights" has never been more apt.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.