What I don't understand from @arusbridger's blog is why The Guardian agreed to destroy the drives?
-
-
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins because the alternative was ceding control of the material to the courts2 replies 3 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arusbridger
@arusbridger You destroyed the data anyway. Surely that's ceding control?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@arusbridger I think it's "you can't be prosecuted for what you can't be proven to have possessed".2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @charlesarthur
@charlesarthur @arusbridger Unless I'm missing the point, it wasn't UK gov's data in the first place. On what grounds could they prosecute?
1:15 AM - 20 Aug 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.