@adambanksdotcom @bazzacollins Anywhere that isn't public. In a closed Facebook group, for example. On email. In an actual pub.
-
-
Replying to @DarienGS
@DarienGS@bazzacollins No, bollocks to that. Free speech doesn’t belong underground.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom@DarienGS Not sure that Article 10 affords Twitter any more protection than any other form of communication.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@DarienGS I’m arguing it affords it no less. Just that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom@DarienGS But as Darien says, that still exposes it to libel/defamation cases. Not sure what distinction you're drawing?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@DarienGS Simply that rules made for “the press” shouldn’t be newly applied to casual conversation. Is that so extreme?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom@DarienGS A tweet that reaches 130 followers shouldn't be treated the same as a libel in the Daily Mail.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@DarienGS Nor should a tweet that reaches 130 million, unless it was produced under the same editorial regime as Daily Mail.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom@DarienGS Disagree with you there. In no other branch of the law is the competence of the offender a factor in guilt.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@DarienGS You’ve surely got to be kidding. When I stick a plaster on next door’s kid I’m not held to GMC standards.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@adambanksdotcom @DarienGS Yeah, fair point. That was a silly comment made in haste. Good job this isn't legally enforceable, eh? *Phew*
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.