@adambanksdotcom @DarienGS Got to say I'm with Darien on that one. When multinationals are using it, you can't afford it pub-chat status.
-
-
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@DarienGS It’s pub chat AND it’s marcomms. Can make and enforce rules for latter but former must retain its protections.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom@bazzacollins FFS IT HAS NONE1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DarienGS
@DarienGS@bazzacollins You can’t just keep moving Article 10 on - “Yes yes, of course you can do that, just not here.” If not here, where?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom@bazzacollins Anywhere that isn't public. In a closed Facebook group, for example. On email. In an actual pub.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DarienGS
@DarienGS@bazzacollins No, bollocks to that. Free speech doesn’t belong underground.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom@DarienGS Not sure that Article 10 affords Twitter any more protection than any other form of communication.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@DarienGS I’m arguing it affords it no less. Just that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom@DarienGS But as Darien says, that still exposes it to libel/defamation cases. Not sure what distinction you're drawing?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@DarienGS Simply that rules made for “the press” shouldn’t be newly applied to casual conversation. Is that so extreme?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@adambanksdotcom @DarienGS I think libel/defamation laws must still apply, but scale of offence/audience must be taken into account.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.