@rfexplorer Quick Q Ariel - with the 3G model why would you ever want to switch to the 240-960 receiver? Does it have any advantages?
-
-
Replying to @PaulOckenden
@PaulOckenden yes, the 240-960 module has about 10dB higher sensitivity in that band.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rfexplorer
@rfexplorer Thanks - I figured that a couple of weeks ago. Have written about RF-Exp in an upcoming issue of@pcpro magazine.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulOckenden
@PaulOckenden great article@pcpro March/13 - I liked it. Great introduction to the RF challenges. Nicely done.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rfexplorer
@rfexplorer Thanks. I did make one schoolboy error that I know of (said RF Explorer range starts at MW, should have said HF). D'oh!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulOckenden
@PaulOckenden Quick Q: I can point to your article on my news. Do u want to include a paragraph, summary or text of your own? TIA1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rfexplorer
@rfexplorer Can you check with the editor@bazzacollins about how much it's acceptable to lift. It will appear on the web at some point.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulOckenden
@PaulOckenden I will do, thanks. Actually, is there a way to contact@bazzacollins by email? It may be easier.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@rfexplorer editor at pcpro dot co dot uk
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.