Not read the Louis Walsh story, but if the paper only reported he was being probed for an alleged sex attack, can't see how it's defamatory
-
-
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins 1. Probed! 2. Balance of Reynolds criteria: v serious allegation, not verified, unproven source, sensationalist reporting, etc1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom Understood, but BBC report of the case says a police investigation was being conducted. Guess The Sun must have pushed it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins Any false allegation might result in a police investigation - that doesn’t automatically confer qualified privilege, obviously1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom Sure. I'm told the story went well beyond straight reporting of the allegation anyway, so I'm dismounting the high horse.
6:06 AM - 28 Nov 2012
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.