Here's another thing: How is it that this went uninvestigated/unexposed by the press? There were obviously rumours in that world.
-
-
Replying to @mrchrisaddison
@mrchrisaddison a) threats of removal of charity donations and b) threats of IRA connections, apparently1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulLomax
@PaulLomax You're off your tits if you think a tabloid editor would be put off by Savile's charity work threat. One word: libel.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins That doesn't normally stop them either...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulLomax
@PaulLomax Oh, it does. Frequently. Everyone got the legal warnings, including your chums at The Guardian. Nobody could stand it up.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins If only Savile had owned a mobile phone…2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @PaulLomax
@PaulLomax English libel law, rightly or wrongly, is heavily weighted in favour of the accused in those situations.
10:52 PM - 22 Oct 2012
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.