Very difficult to tell from reports, but were these Italian quake scientists found guilty of negligence? i.e. They missed obvious signs?
-
-
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins Seems to be more that they issued a reassuring statement when the evidence didn't support it - a Michael Fish offence1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom And it was proven that their actions led people to stay, when they might otherwise have fled to safety?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins Evidence was given to that effect (which doesn't seem surprising, I suppose). No jury though apparently.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom Need to read into it more, but if that's the case, is it not roughly comparable to corporate manslaughter?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins S'pose. Corporate manslaughter obviously doesn't apply to individuals; only gross negligence can result in personal liability1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom
@adambanksdotcom Further reading required. But people always moan over here when CEOs responsible for train crashes escape jail etc.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins True, but I always think those people would be first to run to the union if anyone called them to account in their poxy jobs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@adambanksdotcom Glad I'm not in a job where my judgement is a matter of life and death. I make more bad calls than John Terry :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.