@bohemiangirl It's not as if the allegations are new. So what's prompted them to move now, except the impossibility of a huge libel suit?
-
-
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins I'm thinking more about the women themselves, who maybe deserve a hearing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bohemiangirl
@bohemiangirl Absolutely. But is an ITV "documentary" the place for that?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins Where else, a string of memoires? He was canonised by the media too, maybe this was wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bohemiangirl
@bohemiangirl Maybe. But as I say, these rumours have been knocking around for decades. Surely he deserves right to defend himself too?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins If true and he did do this to chidlren,these are no longer rumours but now testimony.Then no,he doesn't.He got away with it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bohemiangirl
@bohemiangirl The "if" is the problem. ITV isn't a court. And it has an enormous commercial interest in running the allegs, true or not.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins But you seem a bit concerned with him and his honour and his memory. He was creepy to the max.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bohemiangirl
@bohemiangirl That's a low blow. I'm not defending paedophiles. I'm defending a right to a fair trial, not trial by media after you're dead.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins I didn't make any intimation that you were, there is no need to defend him as he is dead, as I said he got away with it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@bohemiangirl "Got away with it" implies guilt, based on nothing more than allegations being made in a TV programme.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.