There’s something v fishy about this Terry announcement. Another charge coming?
-
-
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins almost certainly. Stinks like Billingsgate on a hot afternoon. JT = bar of soap in the bath1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sweder
@Sweder@bazzacollins FA hearing tomorrow over Anton. Guess he's been tipped off and can bow out a hero a day early1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gingeraction
@Gingeraction@Sweder No fan of Terry, but I disagree with FA action. He was found innocent in court of law. Should have stopped there.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@sweder FA had to shelve their investigation coz of CPS action. Evidence in court to convict diff to that needed for FA.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gingeraction
@Gingeraction@Sweder Yep, court has higher burden of proof. FA’s going to potentially finish someone’s career on “balance of probabilities”1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@sweder I think we need to look a bit closer at the player's actions instead of blaming FA.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gingeraction
@Gingeraction@Sweder But that’s what a two-week court case did. If a jury can’t convict him, why should FA?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bazzacollins
@bazzacollins@sweder He admitted in the trial to calling him FBC. Claimed he was repeating Anton accusation which couldn't be disproved1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Gingeraction @Sweder Right. So what can FA add to this then? They have diff evidence? No. Can only arrive at diff verdict.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.