@bazzacollins IMO 99% of camera users (either gender) are put off by "traditional photo mags".
Were women put off by traditional photo mags? >>> PIX - a photography magazine for women http://zite.to/LFJTUv
-
-
-
@bazzacollins for impressive photos, there's NatGeo, boston, etc. Feels like made for OAP photo nerds who don't know the internet exists -
@simon_kiteless Interesting. Have you seen Digital SLR? It’s one of ours, but I don’t find it patronising or alienating. -
@bazzacollins Will have a look next time I'm bored and passing WHS. Back to original question, this: http://www.digitalslrphoto.com/Nudes_Gallery/ -
@simon_kiteless Yep, a fair point. Although much less common in photo mags these days. -
@bazzacollins doesn't help grubby photo nerd image though. "Nudes" and "Glamour" (fem, of course) prominent on front of http://digitalslrphoto.com
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@bazzacollins I have fond memories of my dad's Practical Photography in the 90s. They had a 'glamour' feature once every 3 months or so :-) -
@gj4man Yes, certainty in the old days. But very rarely see glamour features in mags these days.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@bazzacollins Funnily, I seem to remember taking quite a few photos of my kids when they were babies, and I'm pretty sure I'm a man. -
@RiyadEmeran will be interesting to see if it takes off
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@bazzacollins It appears that women want to photograph newborn babies, and traditional camera media probably wasn't catering!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.