Just do it like Rugby Union. Award a goal where, but for foul play, a goal was likely to be scored. Simple.
-
-
-
I think that's too clinical.
-
Solves the problem though. Even a sin bin would help.
-
Then asking ref to judge what would be a goal. Nightmare.
-
Manage it in RU - no bother. Of course you don't get players swearing at referees and intimidating them like you do in kiss ball
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Think that law with the yellow only works when a keeper is in goal. If he rounds the keeper and has an open goal, surely it makes the situation different.
-
Yep. Maybe they need to go back to a red for denying an almost certain goal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It could be argued it should have been a red anyway. Didn’t look like a genuine attempt to play the ball to me. Went through the player from behind.
-
Possibly. Must have been close.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you are already winning 3-0 and get a penalty, wouldn’t the temptation then be to deliberately miss it to get an opponent sent off?
-
If you're already winning 3-0, chances are (a) nobody's going to bother bringing down the last man in the first place, and (b) the game is up anyway.
-
You and I both know that’s not how football (footballers) works
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.