Stating that re-adoption of a prior law or procedure will be evaluated by the DOJ according to the current relevant laws and not merely be presumed lawful is not “Literally arguing that it is illegal…” You were supposedly a practicing attorney at one time.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not even close.. yikes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It said “prior” - not “in 2018” The idea that no voting laws that existed before 2018 were discriminatory in purpose or effect is ridiculous
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Conservatives changing voting laws because they’re freaking out at winning one presidential popular vote since 1988
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ongoing violation is ongoing violation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.