It was literally Taney's argument that the existence of discriminatory laws proved that free black Americans were definitionally not citizens, rather than treating their exercise of key aspects of citizenship as the starting point.https://twitter.com/jbouie/status/1424723653346873348 …
-
-
I actually write legal briefs, I do understand what dicta is. This is infuriating. You keep changing what you mean, which isn't surprising because your arguments are terrible. Dred doesn't mention different laws in states, which is your citation. A good judge would crush that.
-
What is
@michaelpreis trying to argue?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
this is nonsense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.