I don’t know.
-
-
Replying to @BlueBoxDave
Lawyers know. This gives the other side an easy win in court as a substitute for defending their ideas.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Court is irrelevant in this. Utterly, utterly irrelevant. Why can kids learn leftist metaphysical concepts like boys can become girls but can’t learn the Bible? How do you sue your way out of that?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @BlueBoxDave
By filing a lawsuit, obtaining an immediate injunction, & having it upheld on appeal on the basis of a mountain of longstanding precedent, that's how.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
A law suit arguing what? That you can’t teach boys can become girls?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BlueBoxDave
That you can't teach the Bible as religious truth in a government school.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @baseballcrank
How is boys can become girls any different than religious truth?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @BlueBoxDave
It is, in a teleological sense, but it is not grounded in belief in a Supreme Being (quite the opposite), and it is choosing the uphill battle as a legal matter to try to convince courts that secularist beliefs were what the Establishment Clause was written to guard against.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Hence the courts are utterly useless, counter productive, even. This is a cultural fight.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
The absence of prayer in schools is a winning issue for us - in pushing for educational choice, in discrediting the moral authority of public schools. Not in pushing for an established church on the model of the woke Church of England.
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.