How is this sort of opinion-writing jockeying-- which is acknowledged by pretty much every SCOTUS observer-- consistent with the view that the conservative Justices are "just calling balls and strikes"? Shouldn't they be basing their conclusions *only* on the law and the facts?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.