You: "But Matt Gaetz is a yahoo!" Me: "Have you met the average voter in Florida, or for that matter, anywhere on earth?"
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, not really. Party leaders decide who gets to ask questions and serve on committees. Probably not so great for someone under FBI investigation to be interrogating the FBI director or overseeing the Department of Justice.
-
I certainly would not recommend that Republicans follow his lead on anything on oversight, but automatically removing people under investigation from committees would not end well for Democrats, or really, for oversight of the FBI.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
TBF Matt Gaetz is not exactly a disinterested party in regards to the FBI or other LE agencies lately
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Reps who "should not be in Congress" would fill a chamber..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So guilty until proven innocent?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What sort of “rulers” must answer questions under oath?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why not? What is his crime?? Has he been charged with anything??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the point is that the questioning encapsulates the absurdities of keeping him on committee
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*unless the rulers are Republicans, in which case subpoenas are optional and oaths are non-binding.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.