Also a reminder that they were like this before Trumphttps://twitter.com/TomTraversIII/status/1405615613666496512 …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here's Dan. He's a political pundit who had never witnessed a SCOTUS judicial confirmation process until last year.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These plaintiffs lacked standing. Do you believe her vote in NFIB vs Sebelius would have been the same as Ginsburg's?
-
No, but are you claiming that the Democratic Senators ranting about *this* case were unaware that it was no longer 2012?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So making predictions that haven't come true is lying now?https://twitter.com/baseballcrank/status/725855849768439809?s=20 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How can someone lie when making a prediction on what they think someone will do? If I say the Brewers will win the World Series and they don’t, did I lie?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don’t think you know the difference between a lie and an informed opinion. She’s a far-right jurist and believing that she’d of sided with the other far-right judges to destroy the ACA was not a lie. And if you do indeed know the difference, you lied.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Both parties use power cynically when it suits their needs. This is a moot observation. Of course they hounded a pivotal SCOTUS nominee. Did you have the same fervor for when your party made up a reason to not hold a vote on one?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You’ve, uh, met a republican politician, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.