"Don't be hasty in accusing fraud based on securities positions" is one helluva position for Robins Geller to take.https://twitter.com/Law360/status/1405306709464293385 …
Well, Plaintiffs' counsel has basically one job with the lead plaintiff: accurately detail under oath the lead plaintiff's investments in the company. That said, the point of that is to determine its actionable losses. I doubt that short gains from a fund are covered by the PSLRA
-
-
I’ve never seen a single court ever count indirect investments made by an intermediate party, long or short, in the PSLRA calculation. It’s impossible, for one: funds don’t disclose this on a granular level. Robbins Geller has repeatedly been a jerk to me, but this is unfair.
-
Anything else would be double counting, because the investment fund that made the direct investment is the one with the cause of action. I don’t get to bring a PSLRA suit if a defendant defrauded my Vanguard fund.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.