The simple answer is that HR1 is what they already wanted before 2020 & they believe it helps them permanently vs any R, whereas ECA reform only helps them against a repeat of what Trump did in 2020, which only happens if you get Trump again, it's close again, & he loses again.https://twitter.com/allahpundit/status/1403875253001072640 …
-
-
Replying to @baseballcrank
not so sure it only happens if trump is the nominee. the base will cry fraud in the event of any narrow defeat from now on and demand that the results be blocked.
1 reply 3 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @allahpundit
You can't do it unless the candidate goes along.
4 replies 2 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Allahpundit Retweeted Christian Vanderbrouk
the most likely nominee besides trump was willing to go along with the “stop the steal” narrative in 2020https://twitter.com/UrbanAchievr/status/1362800197827452930 …
Allahpundit added,
4 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @allahpundit
As usual, that guy is mischaracterizing the very evidence he cites. That's video from Nov 5, & DeSantis was talking about deterring flagrant violations of the law, not overturning legitimate vote counts.
2 replies 4 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
i think desantis was being careful with his words there so as not to be seen as full-throatedly endorsing trump's plan to pressure state legislatures. but he was winking at the idea of states overturning their results on a fraud pretext, probably at trump's behest
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @allahpundit @baseballcrank
You’re for doing something that’s not an evidence: that’s the great number of discrepancies and peculiarities aren’t sufficient to question whether fraud played a part. I’m sure you feel that’s very reassuring since it, if it happened, kept Trump out …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But the fight against any investigation is not reassuring. In a regular commercial situation, management fighting against an audit would prima facie increase the need for a thorough audit. An audit should increase confidence; objections to an audit decreases confidence. …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And please don’t repeat the canard about how many times it went before the court because (1) the courts declined to consider suits on grounds of standing or timeliness, not on merit (2) a number of court cases that have gone to resolution have validated various objections. …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Standing is not unrelated to the merits. Suits were thrown out on standing grounds because they raised issues that involved an insufficient number of votes to change the outcome.
-
-
Replying to @baseballcrank @allahpundit
Maybe so. But refusing to consider the suits on the merit looks really suspicious. If your goal is to make sure that Trump wasn’t reelected I’m sure it’s fine but for someone who’s been skeptical about elections for 40 years, like me, It’s not reassuring.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.