It's nonsense. Court-packing is a violation of the spirit of the Constitution, but that does not make it, in a legal sense, unconstitutional.https://twitter.com/josh_hammer/status/1387912374397530114 …
-
-
“Court packing”


Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
So why do you guys always want to change the Constitution when things don't go your way? The GOP was fine with changing the number of justices the last three times it was done (1863, 1866 and 1869). In fact *THEY* were the party that forced it through all three times!
-
BTW, I don't know how I feel about it myself, but I just thought I'd take the opportunity to shove one of the arguments I'm always hearing from Republicans (i.e. "Why do Dems always want to change the Constitution?!?!
") right back at ya!!
.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How would that work? Would we pass a constitutional amendment that prohibits any future changes to the number of justices?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Too late the Former Guy
already did it. Those r the rules forever, sorry.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course not, since it’s already been done by McConnell.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.