We should make Court-packing unconstitutional. It is not, presently, so.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
well, you’re certainly consistent in your adamant legal positivism
-
I will die on the hill that written law means things and living constitutionalism is not constitutionalism at all.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Dan is spot tf on.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It used to be mainly a progressive vice to assume that what (they think) the constitution ought to mean is, ipso facto, what it means. Unfortunately, rather than progressives being cured of this error, more and more conservatives are joining them in it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Founding Congress of 1789 created 6 seats.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Have you tried crying about it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes those people who went from 6 justices in 1789 then to 5 in 1801 and then back to 6, then to 10 were all "violating the spirit of the constitution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Learn to love right wing living constitutionalism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.