The complete absence of horrified reaction at the raid on Rudy Giuliani's apartment means that we've quietly abandoned four years of pretending there's a norm against federal investigations of the president's political opponents.
-
-
I can’t even follow the circle McLaughlin is talking in.
-
Me either.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Investigations of political opponents have the obvious risk of being politically motivated sham investigations. Hot take: some are and some aren't. Let facts and law guide that decision of what are and what aren't sham investigations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the most corrupt stuff under Trump was what the AG and DOJ decided NOT to prosecute, not what he did prosecute.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump routinely and publicly asked Barr to go after Biden, in the absence of any independent investigation. He wanted to LAUNCH it. That was the problem. To pretend to not see that glaring and obvious difference here shows too many of your cards.
-
Thank you for pressing him on this. He was a trump critic but has turned more dishonest since he’s been gone IMO.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The investigation of Clinton had already ended before Trump took office. What exactly are you trying to refer to here?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You have no point and not all scenarios are the same.pic.twitter.com/ujLncza3lc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really? Who? Who ever said that legitimate investigations initiated by career professionals must stop if the subject of the investigation is a political opponent of the sitting president?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.