Real talk: in America today, there is not a whole lot of voter fraud, but there is more evidence of actual voter fraud than there is evidence of actual voter suppression.
-
-
Well said, man
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well yes. In a free country the burden of evidence should be stacked against any government entity that wants to emplace voting obstacles.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sorry, do you write for NRO? Are you suggesting it's in line with Conservative values to enact legislation affecting individual rights without showing substantive need, or ensuring that those rights are still protected? Talk about being pro-big government.
-
Matt, tRump has rudely and graphically shown us that many self-destribed "conservatives" are only conservative when it serves their political goals.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Of course the burden of meaningfulness is placed on the side that’s trying to put an obstacle in the way of a constitutional right. Duh.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The fact that facts don’t match your opinions doesn’t make them untrustworthy. Unless, of course, your argument is that you lack the ability to comprehend the research on the topic. From what I’ve read here from you, that seems most likely, Occam’s Razor and all that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. We don't add 53 captchas to a login page, even though it'd be more secure, because access is extremely important. We only add controls as long as we believe they are required to stop abuse. Of course the burden of proof is on the gov. adding more security controls to vote.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.