In which she concedes that she does not have evidence of the election being stolen. As I have written, there were multiple illegal changes to voting rules. My point is that the cause of showing that is harmed by marrying it to "the election was stolen," which is BS.https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1378373264230191112 …
-
-
I worded it poorly there - clarified it here: https://twitter.com/milehighbrendan/status/1378828471355367425?s=21 … If someone thinks my big-picture premise is wrong, okay; I want to know *which part* and why, before engaging on details (which I have observed are often deflections). Big-picture FIRST. That’s all I’m saying.https://twitter.com/MileHighBrendan/status/1378828471355367425 …
-
What I won’t do is engage with the latest iteration of anti-anti-Trump, now anti-anti-disenfranchisement, where *INSTEAD OF* ever discussing the important stuff in context, the debate is always over some cherrypicked detail, side issue, or claim of liberal hypocrisy/overreaction.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.