I argued, as did others at NR, that SCOTUS should take up cases to address flagrant violations - the strongest of which was the Pennsylvania deadline case. But in covering litigation, you can't really just completely ignore the litigants.https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1378370594056642563 …
-
-
"The Law is an ass"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
aren't you missing the fact that every competent lawyer and law firm dropped Trump like a hot potato because they were baseless claims that would destroy reputations and careers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If someone’s legal team was actively trying to sabotage their client they would have acted more subtle than Trump’s team. I’m still confused by their level of incompetence.
-
FWIW, that PA receipt extension case was not chiefly litigated by Trump's team, but by experienced SCT and election law counsel. Let me add one wrinkle to what
@SupremeCtofPA did, if you have any thoughts: (1/2) - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.