But no—those same smart people are gong thru the bill clause by clause, closely arguing with it. In a democracy—whether its machine Dems or now the GOP—it’s wrong to create intentional barriers to voting. We just had fraud free election with an enormous turnout—what was wrong
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @CarlPaulus
“Look at.” Ah—yeah, 73 pages of “looking at” the “problem.”
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @CarlPaulus
**Nobody know what will happen in the future.** Again--you're a historian, I figure you would know that. We had massive turnout and next to zero fraud--and also close monitoring. Dems win and system changes. Why? What was the problem?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson @CarlPaulus
And sure--if you want to say it's grotesquely *partisan* (rather than intra-party Dem Jim Crow), that's fine. As I said, in NH, it's students (12% of voting age pop.) In AZ, it's Latinos. If R's could target GLBT or Jewish voters--both Dem leaning cohorts--they'd do that too.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @CarlPaulus
The 'worst thing to ever happen" is an absurd straw man. In an allegedly advanced democracy, this is **very very bad thing.** And you ought to check what's going on now in MI (a state you know well, I think)--you're behind that story.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
So, it's not "Jim Eagle?"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.